This is where even skilled people can get stuck. They think their experience will speak for itself. They expect hiring managers to recognise their growth and ambition and believe the rest of the story will follow.
But in the initial stages of hiring, everything moves fast. There isn’t a chance to explain things later. The cost of an empty seat weighs heavy, and leaders are looking for hiring outcomes. Reviews of profiles are quick and shortlists get smaller.
Not because the standards are higher, but because it takes effort, time and resources to figure out unclear profiles. Candidates who are easy to understand move forward. Others, even if they are just as qualified, don’t.
I interview people every day. I often see restlessness, fatigue, and the desire for a change. But readiness is often not there. Hiring managers see the same “Are you sure this candidate is ready to move?″.
When asked why they are looking for a change, it’s not that their work has suddenly become unbearable. But something has worn thin. Like “it is good, but it can be better!” For some, it feels that they deserve more. That’s usually when people decide they’re “ready”.
The issue is that this kind of readiness is largely internal. The intention-action gap describes the discrepancy between our intentions and our actual actions. If you want to be found, actions need to follow the intentions.
It’s often why testing or processes have become longer and more deliberate or why interviews are face-to-face and not online. Hiring managers want to see your commitment to the process.